ACLU Goes After Biden

Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

( – Deirdre Schifeling, the ACLU’s Chief Political and Advocacy Officer, has voiced strong concerns about the current administrative efforts to address the myriad issues plaguing the United States border and its immigration system. The ACLU, known for its staunch defense of civil liberties, has a history of legal confrontations with the Trump administration over policies it viewed as detrimental to asylum seekers.

Schifeling has called on the current administration to fulfill its campaign promises by restoring processes for asylum and ensuring that adequate resources are directed to meet the multifaceted challenges at the border. She asserts that such measures are not only morally imperative but are also politically advantageous. According to her, the general electorate regards immigration as a primary issue and anticipates that elected officials will advocate for robust and ethically sound strategies that mirror the foundational values of the nation.

Conversely, President Biden’s approach to these issues has elicited bipartisan criticism. Among the vocal detractors is House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who has labeled Biden’s border strategy as nothing more than a facade. Johnson accuses Biden of having previously minimized the challenges at the border, suggesting that the president had a significant role in creating the current dilemmas.

Johnson also highlighted that under Biden’s leadership, along with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, there have been numerous executive orders aimed at easing border controls. He contends that these actions were deliberate attempts to create a more open border policy. In response to the ongoing criticism, the administration’s recent initiatives have been described by Johnson as mere superficial remedies—mere “window dressing” that fails to truly address the underlying issues. He insists that these half-measures are widely recognized as inadequate, reflecting a calculated, albeit misguided, strategy by the administration.

This back-and-forth shows the intense political and ethical debates surrounding U.S. immigration policy, illustrating the challenges leaders face in navigating the complex interplay of law, humanitarian needs, and national security.

Copyright 2024,

Previous articleTrump Demands His Gag Order Get Lifted
Next articleTrump Case Halted, Fani Willis Staying On