Supreme Court delivers a powerful victory for states’ rights, allowing South Carolina to defund Planned Parenthood despite federal Medicaid requirements, opening the door for more conservative states to follow suit.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that South Carolina can exclude Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program, a significant win for states’ rights over federal healthcare mandates.
- Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion determined that Medicaid recipients cannot sue states for provider choice violations, overturning lower court rulings.
- This decision may impact healthcare access for low-income women who rely on Planned Parenthood for services beyond abortion, which is already excluded from Medicaid funding.
- The ruling builds upon the 2022 Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, further allowing states to determine their own policies regarding abortion-adjacent services.
- Planned Parenthood warns this could lead to the closure of nearly 200 health centers in 24 states, significantly reducing healthcare options for Medicaid recipients.
States’ Rights Triumph Over Federal Medicaid Mandates
In a landmark decision strengthening states’ sovereignty over federal healthcare regulations, the Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that South Carolina can exclude Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program. The case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, stemmed from a 2018 executive order by Governor Henry McMaster that blocked Medicaid reimbursements to clinics providing abortion services. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the conservative majority, determined that federal law does not grant Medicaid enrollees the right to sue states over provider choice violations, effectively reversing lower court rulings that had temporarily blocked McMaster’s order.
“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote. “But that is not the law we have.”
Governor McMaster celebrated the ruling as validation of years-long efforts to protect taxpayer dollars from supporting abortion providers. The decision marks a significant advancement for conservative states looking to exercise greater control over healthcare funding priorities without federal interference. This ruling follows South Carolina’s implementation of a six-week abortion ban and builds upon the momentum of the 2022 Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, continuing the transfer of abortion policy decisions from federal to state control.
The US Supreme Court has already started issuing decisions.
Wondering what's at stake for our rights and values this term? Scroll through our explainer to see how #SCOTUS cases will impact our fundamental freedoms. And learn even more at https://t.co/7udR0nPLOV #CourtsMatter pic.twitter.com/rqfQzdx65Q
— National Council of Jewish Women (@NCJW) June 11, 2025
Implications for Low-Income Healthcare Access
The Court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences for healthcare access among low-income Americans. Nearly half of Planned Parenthood’s patients nationwide receive care through Medicaid, with the organization warning that defunding could lead to the closure of approximately 200 health centers across 24 states. One-third of Planned Parenthood’s total revenue comes from state and federal funding, including Medicaid reimbursements. While federal law already prohibits Medicaid from covering abortion services, the organization provides numerous other essential healthcare services including cancer screenings, STI testing, and contraception.
“Today’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her dissent. “South Carolina asks us to hollow out that provision so that the state can evade liability for violating the rights of its Medicaid recipients to choose their own doctors. The court abides South Carolina’s request. I would not.”
The ruling is particularly significant for states with shortages of primary care providers, where Planned Parenthood clinics often serve as critical access points for basic healthcare services. South Carolina is among these states, raising concerns about where Medicaid patients will receive care if Planned Parenthood locations become financially unsustainable. Conservative analysts point out that community health centers and other providers can fill this gap, and that states should have the authority to direct taxpayer dollars toward providers that align with their values.
Broader Legal and Political Implications
This decision potentially opens the door for states to exclude providers from Medicaid for reasons beyond abortion services, giving states unprecedented discretion in shaping their healthcare networks. The ruling aligns with President Trump’s administration position, which supported South Carolina’s stance during earlier phases of the litigation. The decision effectively reverses years of lower court rulings that had previously upheld individuals’ rights to sue under the “free choice of provider” clause in Medicaid law, which allows recipients to choose any qualified provider.
“Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortion providers who are in direct opposition to their beliefs,” Governor Henry McMaster stated. “Seven years ago, we took a stand to protect the sanctity of life and defend South Carolina’s authority and values – and today, we are finally victorious.”
Looking ahead, a House Republican spending bill aims to bar Medicaid from funding Planned Parenthood nationwide, though its future in the Senate remains uncertain. The Supreme Court’s ruling gives legal backing to such efforts, potentially paving the way for similar executive actions in other conservative states. This represents another significant victory for the pro-life movement and states’ rights advocates, allowing state governments to align healthcare funding with local values rather than federal mandates.
