The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a landmark ban on two cancer-causing solvents, trichloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (Perc), in a move that could significantly impact industries ranging from dry cleaning to manufacturing.
At a Glance
- EPA bans TCE for all uses and Perc for most consumer and commercial applications
- Both chemicals are linked to cancer and other serious health risks
- Ban aims to protect public health and align with Biden’s Cancer Moonshot initiative
- Some industrial uses of Perc will continue with strict worker protections
- Environmental advocates welcome the ban, while industry groups express concerns
EPA Takes Bold Action Against Toxic Solvents
The Environmental Protection Agency has taken a decisive step to protect public health by banning two widely used solvents, trichloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (Perc). These chemicals, commonly found in dry cleaning facilities and various industrial applications, have long been associated with cancer risks and other severe health issues.
TCE, used in cleaners, spot removers, lubricants, and glues, has been linked to liver cancer, kidney cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. It also poses risks to the nervous and immune systems. The EPA’s ban on TCE is comprehensive, covering all uses under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which was strengthened in 2016.
A highly toxic solvent used in dry cleaning and a broad range of industrial processes and consumer products is contaminating drinking water supplies for 19 million people. It's called trichloroethylene, and it's time for EPA to phase it out. https://t.co/a74Iax8T3R
— Earthjustice (@Earthjustice) December 12, 2023
Perc Ban and Exceptions
While the ban on TCE is all-encompassing, the restrictions on Perc are slightly less stringent. Perc, primarily used in dry cleaning and automotive care products, will be banned for most consumer and commercial uses. However, certain industrial applications, particularly in aviation and defense, will be allowed to continue under strict worker protection measures.
“It’s simply unacceptable to continue to allow cancer-causing chemicals to be used for things like glue, dry cleaning or stain removers when safer alternatives exist.” – Michal Freedhoff
The EPA’s decision to allow some workplace uses of Perc to continue, particularly in critical infrastructure and national security sectors, reflects a balance between health concerns and essential industrial needs. These exceptions will be subject to robust controls and a Workplace Chemical Protection Plan.
Impact on Industries and Public Health
The ban is expected to have far-reaching effects on industries that have long relied on these chemicals. Dry cleaning businesses, in particular, may need to adapt to new cleaning methods and technologies. The EPA has announced plans to release compliance guidance for small businesses and host a public webinar on the Perc rule to assist with the transition.
Public health advocates have long sought these bans, citing the chemicals’ widespread presence in the environment. TCE, for instance, has been found in drinking water across the United States and was prominently featured in the book and movie “A Civil Action.” The EPA’s decision is expected to save lives by reducing exposure to these toxic substances.
Challenges and Future Outlook
While the ban has been welcomed by environmental and health advocates, it has faced criticism from industry groups concerned about economic impacts.
“They’ve been telling me for decades that they’re going to ban TCE, so it’s such a big deal it’s finally happening.” – Linda Robles
Despite these challenges, the EPA’s decision represents a significant step forward in chemical safety regulation. By prioritizing public health over economic concerns, the agency is setting a precedent for future environmental and safety policies. As industries adapt to these new regulations, the focus will likely shift to developing and implementing safer alternatives to these harmful chemicals.
