OB/GYN doctor dodges basic biology in Senate hearing, refusing to admit men cannot get pregnant—exposing the radical left’s grip on medical testimony even as President Trump advances real protections for women.
Story Highlights
- Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) grills Dr. Nisha Verma up to 11 times on whether men can get pregnant; she evades with talk of “patient identities.”
- Exchange highlights clash between biological truth and gender ideology in debate over dangerous chemical abortion drugs like mifepristone.
- Sen. Ashley Moody (R-FL) first poses question, underscoring women’s health risks ignored by pro-abortion witnesses.
- Viral moment bolsters conservative pushback against woke science, tying to Supreme Court transgender sports case day prior.
- Pro-life leaders demand Trump administration suspend mifepristone amid safety concerns for American women.
Hearing Erupts Over Biological Reality
U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held a hearing titled “Protecting Women: Exposing the Dangers of Chemical Abortion Drugs” in the Dirksen Senate Office Building. Sen. Ashley Moody (R-FL) first asked OB/GYN Dr. Nisha Verma if men can get pregnant. Verma, from Physicians for Reproductive Health, refused a yes-or-no answer. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) then pressed her repeatedly, up to 11 times per reports, insisting on scientific truth. Hawley tied the question to women’s safety in abortion pill discussions, arguing biology matters for policy protecting females.
Doctor’s Evasion Undermines Credibility
Dr. Verma, a board-certified OB/GYN and medical professor from Atlanta-based Physicians for Reproductive Health, called yes-no questions a “political tool.” She prioritized “complex patient experiences” and identities over direct answers. Hawley countered that women represent a “biological reality” central to the hearing’s focus on mifepristone risks. Witnesses like Louisiana AG Liz Murrill and Dr. Monique Chireau Wubbenhorst testified on adverse health events from chemical abortions. Verma’s dodge raises doubts about pro-abortion advocates’ grasp of basic science, frustrating conservatives who value truth in medicine.
Context of Abortion Pill Dangers
The hearing addressed FDA-loosened rules on mifepristone, including mail-order without in-person visits, sparking Republican challenges from Missouri AG and Texas lawsuits. Post-Roe v. Wade overturn in 2022, states restrict these drugs due to safety issues for women. The gender question underscores how identity politics clouds women’s health policy. It echoes prior GOP probes into biology, like transgender athletes, and aligns with Supreme Court arguments the day before on bans for biological males in women’s sports, emphasizing physiological differences vital to conservative family values.
Power dynamics favored senators, who hold hearing authority, over Verma representing abortion access advocates. Pro-life groups like Family Research Council amplified the clip post-hearing.
Viral Backlash and Trump-Era Pushback
The exchange went viral on January 15, 2026, with Hawley posting on X: “SPOILER ALERT: Men cannot get pregnant” and “Not a difficult question.” Moody shared her clip questioning the doctor. Hawley stated Democrats ignore “scientific fact” for “abortion on demand.” Pro-life leader Tony Perkins demands FDA reinstate in-person visits and the Trump administration suspend mifepristone distribution. This moment bolsters GOP narratives against radical left policies eroding common sense, as President Trump prioritizes American women over globalist agendas.
Short-term, it amplifies divides on abortion and gender, questioning trust in such testimony. Long-term, it pressures FDA regulations and state lawsuits, reinforcing biology in healthcare and sports policy.
Sources:
Hawley, Moody react after heated Senate abortion hearing exchange: ‘Can men get pregnant?’
Abortion Doctor Won’t Answer Congress Whether Men Can Get Pregnant














